Thursday, September 29, 2005

Reese Pecked


So he looked in the mirror and saw some residue still there; a leftover of that mask of attractiveness a woman had seen one minute ago. It was fading fast; a freckled tan in September. He talked to himself when he pee'd. He muttered to himself that it wasn't the type of person he wanted to be. He looked at his flaccid penis, and he was reminded of a pubescent dream, one where he was orally copulated by a woman while standing at a urinal. Unlike players in some other dreams, this woman was actually an acquaintance, but up to then hadn't contemplated her in a sexual way. She looked him in the eyes as she slowly, moistly took him into her mouth. It soothed him for 20 years. When he saw her again in the halls of the synagogue, she didn't known of any dreams, and he didn't see anything in her eyes. His dreams were like an annoying cancer trying to take hold of his thoughts. It was really too bad, he thought, that he was so emotionally resilient. It would have been much easier to break like a twig, and ask her to follow him into a bathroom and risk the consequences. He felt informed by some vague or distantly understood set of values. So what good were the values, he thought, if he couldn't even articulate them. Again it came to mind; that's just not the type of person he wanted to be. It wasn't enough that he wanted some sort of earthly reward for his propriety and restraint. No. He wanted a trophy for his silence, for his good heart. The goodness of his heart had after all prevented a toothy and reprehensible, smiling, fat, groaning monster from taking him away into fantasies realized. A tincture of goodness was all that was left. And it ripped away the curse of smoothness and likeability - that thing, melting away in the mirror.

How can the thing which makes you likable be the source of your folly at once. It's just cruel. A cruel mistake of the creator. Pleasing proportions, everything arranged nicely, not even perfectly, but even pleasing was so much better than the dog-faced ugly creatures who roamed the world. With their horsy smiles, sharky noses - nostrils lifted upward revealing the awful dank cilia inside - and the mother fuckers all smile. He wanted to snap their heads off. Strangle them. Why did they get the gift of blissful ignorance? Ah, their ugliness was his reward. Better now that he remembered all the fine balance in creation. His silence had become an armor and their lies bounced off him. His goodness was both his enemy and the very sword that would slay his nemesis. Cruel God.

There was a third person inside him - the one that could see both. It floated detached, sucking on a mint, observing and commenting, wincing at its choice of the wrong words to describe the absurd scene unfolding before it. It too had the potential to metastasize yet another thousand voices. It was getting pretty crowded in there. The first thing he thought of was the plaza around the grand Temple in Jerusalem - with all of the pilgrims of Israel who had come to supplicate before God on the holiest day of the year. Voice upon voice. Some uttered in unison - God full of compassion - compassion the lengths of exponential infinity and favoring compassion and truth. At other times just personal screams to save an ox, a harvest blighted, a son deformed, a spouse strayed. The marble below their feet polished and trodden from centuries of feet. And behind a curtain in front of them stands a man praying for himself.

Anyone who doesn't believe in God must have some solid explanation for the cruel joke that this whole thing presents. It was true, he thought, what the sages had understood and distilled into one single shot of deep and eternal wisdom; that axiom which sees each person as a universe. Not only of the families upon families and friends, students, enemies, cashiers and lovers which encircle the individual. But did they also reference in their exalted moment of clarity about the nature of humans, the eternal and ceaseless cast looming inside every mind - the casual game of host that each of us plays, doubting one voice not so popular while giving reinforcement to another. Sometimes like a cheap talk show; the moderator with a wireless microphone running from the black woman in the fluffy sweater to the college guy in flip flops, soliciting views, opinions and passions from his audience. At other times cranking some knob to spice it up with canned laughter or applause - the audience has gone home, to give voice to their own galaxies of bit players.

The man remembered - he once thought of the word respect. In some pedantic moment of revelation years ago, that it, the word respect, had multiple meanings and therefore needed to be recorded in the annals of some disheveled diary or collection of sugar potent stupidity. Respect in fact had to do with time. Seeing the surface and not rushing to note the adjoining facet, but rather forcing oneself to be at one side, to observe it until it was fully or at least adequately understood. Yes, perhaps this realization wasn't of the same quality of the majority of flotsam which he had uncovered in all his other years. After all, it might hold the key to unlocking the serenity which he so desperately sought. Respect. No, it's not a Hebrew word, but still English does have its moments. Again, one can respect an opinion, for instance. But in order to have that capacity or knowledge, one must first have the patience to sit and hear the alternate view expressed. Or one could say, from this respect I understand thus and such in a different way. Angles, like facets of a jewel, often adjoin not at perfect opposing directions, but instead in very subtle divisions. Like roads diverging at not exacting rectangular intersections, rather splitting off, with the original path slowly diverging for miles before it sways off into its own distant sequence. He wondered what it would have been to stay on that road. He agonizes whether or not to tease himself into yet another rage, or instead to quietly regret. And yet one must still turn the precious stone in order to respect each side - to allow the light to shine from it - to have its due in the sun, under a lamp - to serve as a mirror. Even if it is the wrong side.

Tuesday, September 13, 2005

GO JOE!! YOU DA' MAN!


Please send your emails of support to Senator Biden. Even if you don't agree with every position he's taken - now is the time to let him know that his role in the confirmation hearings of Judge Roberts is essential in keeping vigor and critique central to the democratic process. While the Republicans tinkle over their darling nominee, Senator Biden played some very hard ball this morning and I was cheering him on. But my steering wheel doesn't care, so perhaps you all will.

-C

http://biden.senate.gov/newsroom/details.cfm?id=245583&

Thursday, September 08, 2005

Pete Townshend Becomes a blogger



Hi all, I'd like to alert your attention to a new blog by my good ol' buddy Pete Townshend. He's going to blog a novella using the very same domain as I. Here's the link. I'm sure it will be very thorougly read and analyzed.

Best,
-Chaim
http://www.boywhoheardmusic.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, September 07, 2005

Important Message from Michael Moore

Hi everyone,
here's a link to Michael Moore's information page regarding aid to victims of Hurricane Katrina (and government incompetence - read below). Yasher Koach to Micahel Moore.

-Chaim

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?id=184"



Friday, September 02, 2005

Human Nature: Tribal

Government Impotence: Inexcusable

The Latest Rant by Yours Truly

The monetary cost of rebuilding areas of the gulf region destroyed or damaged by Hurricane Katrina will be in excess of one hundred billion dollars. Many hundreds, if not thousands of lives have been lost in the wake of this disaster, both directly related to the storm, but also from hunger, dehydration, lack of proper medical attention, and crime – just to mention a few. It is possible to conflate hunger, dehydration and crime into one category – that would be labeled 'direct and immediate results of governmental negligence.’ The tragedy of lives lost due to the lack of sanitary facilities, food and safety - all begs a question; How many lives could have been spared had there been proper resources, both human and material in place prospectively, before and immediately after the storm did its thing?

I was a victim of a crime earlier this week. A person or group of persons somehow got hold of the number on my ATM card as well as my PIN and began siphoning money out of my account over a period of about 4 days. I usually don’t check my balance that often so basically my account showed a balance of 0$ by the time I saw it. I wasted a day of work dealing with this, not to mention burning precious gasoline driving to Fullerton California to file a police report. I’m stressed, angry, and also scared. I fear using plastic money for any purpose, or in any setting. I fear that the crooks actually still have access to my account and are just waiting to pounce again.

I know that while my fears are justifiable, they are probably not entirely rational. After all, I needed to and was ultimately able to get on with my business. Am I going to carry a couple hundred dollars in cash around with me wherever I go? Yeah, our parents probably used to do that when we were kids; when credit cards represented a different class, when Visa and Diner’s Club were basically it, and credit was something earned via personal integrity, or at very least by being one heck of a good player.

Stealing a stranger’s money can in fact be rational. If your goal is to have enough money in your bank account, to own a car and fill it with gas, have a place to live and food to eat, then finding some way of acquiring money is simply essential, and practically all means are born out of rational decision making. Yes, I think I was taught either through explicit lessons, i.e. teacher said “don’t steal because bla bla bla . . “ or I saw Hawaii five-O and guys who stole got the crap beat out of them by Danno. All in all, I pretty much figured out that stealing was a bad idea. Although I did steal The Rutles 'All You Need is Cash' (a vinyl LP) from a church carnival about 24 years ago, so I didn’t learn very well. Or perhaps I learned with caveats, like if you’re going to take something, then have a solid reason. Mine was that I REALLY wanted that album, and so even my feable attempt at winning the toss-it game or whatever before snatching the record from behind the stall somehow justified my desperate act. So my snake brain stole, and my cerebrum rationalized it.

I think it became more about stealing and not getting caught, as opposed to ‘stealing is bad.’ By and large I’m not a big thief, but there are shades of gray between career criminality and the perfect citizen, i.e. not informing the cashier that he gave you too much change. I don’t do that, but I’m not sure I would consider it outright theft either. In such a scenario, does having driven 5 blocks or from the store absolve you of the need to turn the car around for all of 50¢ ?

Stealing is on the spectrum of deviant behaviors, like peeing in public, or flicking a cigarette butt out the window. But is it deviance if nobody sees or cares that it’s happening? Is it deviant to loot from an abandoned store if the authorities recognize that looting is the only means of survival? Of course there are degrees. Stealing 50 cents from a payphone change slot and purposely dumping a bucket of urine on Rodeo Drive are two very different acts. Who decides, and when, that the rules are suspended? Is that a sub-section of rules included in the social contract we signed at birth? Forget for the moment about what is punishable by statutes because lots of things merit punishment while other things only warrant it.

Shooting at a rescue helicopter both merits and warrants immediate and severe punishment. If you don’t agree with that, then don’t bother reading more because we’re on different planets. Looting for profit in a zone of great devastation is reprehensible. It symbolizez a complete abyss in the values that our systems of education and faith are supposedly there to teach. It too merits punishment and warrants a response worthy of the act. However there are urgent needs that aren’t being met right now. And our president is appointing his predecessor and his daddy to raise private funds for victims. Hundreds of billions of dollars have been allocated toward shock, awe, the spreading of liberty, and the buttressing of a crony regime while Bush Senior and Clinton have been sent out to conduct the equivalent of a bake sale to help mitigate the suffering in our gulf region.

Theft is an act whereby an individual is deprived by another of property, money, means, rights, or to life itself. I posit that this administration has deprived the already needy and impoverished masses of people living in the wake of Hurricane Katrina to their basic rights. It’s as if they’ve been handed a copy of the Constitution with sentences blacked-out. Many have been abandoned by authorities, herded into badly planned refugee housing, or simply left to die without basic means of survival. And yet this very same administration has ordered a ‘zero tolerance’ policy (see my previous entry entitled Zero Tolerance plus One) regarding looting in the devastated areas. In my opinion, it is high time that the masses in this country begin to immediately demonstrate zero tolerance for a government which has completely upside-down priorities regarding the welfare of its citizens.

A country with inestimable wealth, medical technology par excellence, superior means of transportation, and the strongest fighting force on the planet cannot seem to muster the necessary resources to save its citizens after a storm. Suddenly we need telethons, private charity dinners, and grassroots-internet efforts to help these masses get to some degree of equilibrium. Children are dying. People are wading in their own waste and garbage FOR DAYS, without hope or any indication of when the help is going to arrive. Hundreds of billions are being spent on an unpopular, un-winnable war overseas. And our president is sitting in front of us with that all too familiar deer in the headlights expression (the same one he had four years and a few days ago when he was reading Pokey The Goat). He doesn’t know what to do, or how to do it. Perhaps he should declare war on poverty. But no, he’ll just declare war on the looters. He'll siphon off resources from victim relief to fight looters. He’ll stupidly proclaim that nobody had any idea that the levies would fail while earlier this year a huge government-sponsored commission met to study “Hurricane Pam” - a hypothetical disaster in New Orleans - and guess what folks – that’s right - the levies were breached in hypothetical “Hurricane Pam.”

I must say that the single largest revelation has been watching the footage of all the unfortunate people victimized by the storm, left like the storm flotsam itself by their governing, elected officials. An overwhelming percentage of victims seem to be black people. Say it isn’t so. This isn’t just classism (as if ‘just’ isn’t bad enough).

One last thing. Bill Clinton should publicly come to a podium and declare that he has every intention of marshaling human and material resources to benefit and save the victims. In the same breath he should then point a finger straight at the White House and ask the nation where its leader is. Where are the tax dollars being siphoned? Where is the corporate welfare pissed away? Where are the helicopters, the shock and awe of Americans coming to save other Americans?!?! But he probably won't.